Honduras privatizes it’s fisheries
08/10/15
Jorge Varela Márquez, Goldman Environmental Prize 1999, denounces
the new fishing law of his country, which, after year of resistance by fishing
communities, surrenders it’s national sovereignty to transnational
cooperations…
“Worldwide, and with special intensity in the countries
of the South, the “Grabbing of Land and Oceans” takes place, that is,
the facilitated acquisition by the oligarchies and transnational corporations
of the biodiversity that inhabit the lands, seas, lakes, ponds, rivers,
wetlands of a country. This dispossession of resources violates human and
cultural rights of millions of people and is facilitated by the World Bank,
supported by many governments of the “First and Third World!” with
the cooperation of some international organizations once pro-environment and
now pro-business. This policy of plundering works against the food security of
millions of people.
of the South, the “Grabbing of Land and Oceans” takes place, that is,
the facilitated acquisition by the oligarchies and transnational corporations
of the biodiversity that inhabit the lands, seas, lakes, ponds, rivers,
wetlands of a country. This dispossession of resources violates human and
cultural rights of millions of people and is facilitated by the World Bank,
supported by many governments of the “First and Third World!” with
the cooperation of some international organizations once pro-environment and
now pro-business. This policy of plundering works against the food security of
millions of people.
To deprive countries
of their goods attractive terms are used such as the “right to private property,”
“transferable fishing quotas,” “secure access,”
“Marine Protected Areas” etc. In Honduras the giving away of
resources process began in the early 90’s along with efforts to pass a new Law
on Fisheries and Aquaculture (LPA). Over the years, Congress never went against
the opposition from artisanal fishermen who are currently disjointed and the
Non Gubernmental Organizations dedicated to implementing projects, which hurts
their advocacy work. At this juncture, President John O. Hernandez, who
controls Congress and the Supreme Court, succeeds in having a new LPA approved
on September 23, 2015. Despite the “cosmetic” changes it has
undergone over the years, this law robs Honduras of its aquatic and food.
of their goods attractive terms are used such as the “right to private property,”
“transferable fishing quotas,” “secure access,”
“Marine Protected Areas” etc. In Honduras the giving away of
resources process began in the early 90’s along with efforts to pass a new Law
on Fisheries and Aquaculture (LPA). Over the years, Congress never went against
the opposition from artisanal fishermen who are currently disjointed and the
Non Gubernmental Organizations dedicated to implementing projects, which hurts
their advocacy work. At this juncture, President John O. Hernandez, who
controls Congress and the Supreme Court, succeeds in having a new LPA approved
on September 23, 2015. Despite the “cosmetic” changes it has
undergone over the years, this law robs Honduras of its aquatic and food.
Consistent with the
dictates generated by the “global grabbing of oceans,” this LPA gives
“private property rights” and “transfers” to:
“licensed aquaculture operators,” “boat licensees” and
those having “fishing quotas” who also acquire the power to put these
state assets for sale, rent, and mortgage with guaranteed credit from the
National Bank without the need for governmental approval! In such case, the
state is required only to “register the final acts” of the transactions.
dictates generated by the “global grabbing of oceans,” this LPA gives
“private property rights” and “transfers” to:
“licensed aquaculture operators,” “boat licensees” and
those having “fishing quotas” who also acquire the power to put these
state assets for sale, rent, and mortgage with guaranteed credit from the
National Bank without the need for governmental approval! In such case, the
state is required only to “register the final acts” of the transactions.
The other requirement is “right of access” to territories and
biological resources including genetic resources. Consistent with this,
Congress eliminates the “exclusive zone for artisanal fishing” and
gives the right of access to vessels of 5 tons with high-tech self-navigation
systems that do not yet exist in Honduras.
biological resources including genetic resources. Consistent with this,
Congress eliminates the “exclusive zone for artisanal fishing” and
gives the right of access to vessels of 5 tons with high-tech self-navigation
systems that do not yet exist in Honduras.
It also authorizes
“access rights” to the shrimp trawl fleet and to other Honduran and
foreign industrial vessels that can fish in all of the “Exclusive Economic
Zone” including the coastal zone. Further, it grants access to aquatic and
genetic resources to foundations, laboratories and research centers (local and
foreign), which acquire rights for exploitation and management.
“access rights” to the shrimp trawl fleet and to other Honduran and
foreign industrial vessels that can fish in all of the “Exclusive Economic
Zone” including the coastal zone. Further, it grants access to aquatic and
genetic resources to foundations, laboratories and research centers (local and
foreign), which acquire rights for exploitation and management.
In short, the
new laws proceeds to surrender national sovereignty and thus of food
sovereignty through the privatization of fisheries and the elimination of
artisanal fishermen, with the marginalization that this entails of many coastal
communities that depend on aquatic resources.
new laws proceeds to surrender national sovereignty and thus of food
sovereignty through the privatization of fisheries and the elimination of
artisanal fishermen, with the marginalization that this entails of many coastal
communities that depend on aquatic resources.
Now, the only recourse is the right to challenge that law
because of its unconstitutionality and because it undermines human and cultural
rights. There is also the option to present this case of “resource
appropriation” in the upcoming World Conference on Climate Change or to
other international authorities.”
because of its unconstitutionality and because it undermines human and cultural
rights. There is also the option to present this case of “resource
appropriation” in the upcoming World Conference on Climate Change or to
other international authorities.”